|
Post by draggoas on Nov 27, 2008 12:17:48 GMT -7
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG _____________I_______________ x x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----TTTT JJJJJJJJ G=emenies x= our tanks T= our heavy attackers J= our spears Well im not sure if this will make any sence but just an idea i thought of, it would require more people, G is enemy team, the team closest is our team. what would happen is the 4 "T"s in back would all move to the left, they would be heavy attackers, with light defence, they would try and curl around the end and break through then where the "I" is one person would charge through and break the sheild line, the people in second row the "J" would all be spear men, and come in behind and take anyone one who let there gaurd down. From there on the Left side should be able to take them out if they all dont die Hmm now that i think about it, this could work with a team of 5 or 4 but no charge from one person in front line Pretty much if this hasnt made any sence, one side light defence with strong attacks other side with strong defence. hope you like it (also please note i do relize that enemy is way outnumbered)
|
|
|
Post by draggoas on Nov 27, 2008 12:21:48 GMT -7
(the ____________ is there only so i could get the "I" in the right spot
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Nov 27, 2008 22:20:49 GMT -7
Thats a great idea and has potential. Just let me get one thing straight, you only have one guy charge through the spear line?! If thats so I now how to improve on that, why don't you have same number of guys who hold the line as the number of Spearman charge into the other line and have the spearman take their place in the line. Just because the other team is already outnumbered why don't you also add a few archers to each side of the line so that if any of the enemy try to go around the our line they will find a nice little surprise. Also, the archers on the left side of the line would benefit the heavy attackers for they could keep the enemy busy while they circled around the line. It is kind of hard to try to maneuver on an attacking force when you are also being bombarded with arrows.
|
|
|
Post by draggoas on Nov 28, 2008 12:01:17 GMT -7
ya, i was just trying to keep it kinda simple, i defintly did think about archers, but its kinda anoying to set everyset up right. he doesnt charge through a sprear line that was sopose to be him changing through a sheild line with spear coming in behind him
|
|
|
Post by Cib on Nov 28, 2008 22:56:00 GMT -7
Did you try this today? If not, you should see if you can simplify it for 3-4 people so we can try it.
|
|
|
Post by draggoas on Nov 29, 2008 10:38:21 GMT -7
no we would need 5 people it would be like this... x=sheild y=attacker
yxyxx
that would be the line up
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Nov 29, 2008 12:41:25 GMT -7
Thats a good line up. It might, after the two heavy attackers charge, be a good idea to get the one lone shield guy to pull together with the rest of the shield guys. Also, After the shield guys have moved together they should move a bit to the right and at an angle. It would look sort of like this. x=shield y=attacker g=bad guy ygyggx Note: Angle is exaggerated. x x
With such an angle it would ensure that the "g" on the far left of there line doesn't try to go around on our right side. After the two "y" guys have charged through the line the "x" guys should curl around it on the right and all of them should reform on the other side. Once they have formed a line again then they should charge right back at the enemy. This would offer good practice in: forming, charging, forming, and charging again, all within a short period of time.
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Nov 29, 2008 12:59:14 GMT -7
Sorry, my diagram didn't work to well.
|
|
|
Post by Cib on Nov 29, 2008 13:33:28 GMT -7
Try using the - or _ instead of spaces. If you want, change them to white so you cant see them.
ygyggx --------x -----------x
ygyggx --------x -----------x
[color=White]-----------[/color] The code looks like this.
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Dec 1, 2008 12:09:34 GMT -7
Like this:
ygyggx -----x ----x
Edited
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Dec 1, 2008 12:09:22 GMT -7
Nope, it sill doesn't work.
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Dec 1, 2008 12:11:08 GMT -7
Nope, it still doesn't work.
|
|
|
Post by Cib on Dec 1, 2008 16:52:47 GMT -7
Code needs to be in [] not ()
|
|
|
Post by Darr on Dec 3, 2008 10:36:22 GMT -7
Oh
|
|